Mitt Romney: The Ultimate Naked Emperor

Posted by on Feb 7, 2012 in Interviews | 6 comments

  • View in iTunes

    • Larken Rose author of ‘The Most Dangerous Superstition’ joins Daily Paul Radio with Kurt Wallace for ‘Mitt Romney: The Ultimate Naked Emperor’ to discuss what a Mitt Romney presidency would look like. Larken Rose explains why he has ‘endorsed’ Romney for President and what it would do for the American mindset. Could Romney be the default teacher of Liberty?

    Special Thanks to our sponsor Kristos Trading for offering listeners of this podcast one FREE silver coin with a minimum order of gold, silver and other precious metals. Just call Kristos Trading at 888-385-1116 and mention ’Daily Paul Radio’ when placing your order.

    Standard Podcast Play Now | Play in Popup | Download (1024)
    • Anonymous

      Sorry, I have no interest in Romney. On election day I’ll either be voting Ron Paul or fishing. Both sound nice.

    • Scott
    • Anonymous

      Larken said we should put in there an obviously principle-free, bought-and-paid-for candidate?

      Sorry.
      That was Bush II and then Obama was the blowback.

      Now people are pissed at Obama AND partly at democrats – so they’re more likely to view Republicans as “lesser of two evils” as independents constantly say on Neal Boortz’s radio show.

      Putting Romney in there does the opposite of what we have now. People will be pissed at another rich white guy republican and the blowback will be an ACTUAL communist dressed as a Democrat.

      No.
      This is a TERRIBLE idea.
      It runs contrary to the ENTIRE revolution.

      This is a good convo to have when you’re drunk in a pub – but then you turn the convo back to campaigning for our Constitution.

      Have some principles.
      Then stand for them.

      Only Ron Paul in 2012.

    • Pingback: Mitt Romney: The Ultimate Naked Emperor : Ron Paul Abilene

    • http://PressForFreedom.com/ Rahn

      This is from the crash it faster school, I’ve even seen people say apply for every program and crash it faster… I’m still for avoiding the crash part, I don’t think we need to suffer to prevail. I think we need to just start living like we are free, because we are.
      There are those who claim to have power over us and claim to be able to take away our freedom, but they are wrong. Freedom exists in the mind, although someone can restrict your liberty by force, they can never take your freedom.

    • Debbie

      When someone is very sick from some toxic overload, you don’t cure him with some different type of toxic overload. You take the medicine-herbal is my choice-from the good doctor-Ron Paul is my choice-and get over it. It may taste bad, and you may have a tough road ahead, but it is never right to do wrong in order to get a chance to do right. The Bible says, “Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.”—not the lesser of two evils. I will NOT vote for the lesser of two evils. I don’t have to. Ron Paul gets my vote!!!=)

      • Stephen Adkins

        Your toxic overload metaphor isn’t quite what he is saying. He is saying that if, as a physician, you have a patient who is sick but does not know it, perhaps the best thing for that patient is to become obviously sick. Maybe then the patient will be willing to take the herbal medicine that tastes bad. Rose’s point is that most people simply don’t understand what is wrong with this country, and perhaps the best way for them to be ready to take the “medicine” – freedom – is for things to be reeeally bad and for enough people to attribute it to the right causes.

        How horrible it would be for the ideal of freedom if Ron Paul assumed the captaincy of the Titanic as it was already sinking, to have the freedom philosophy linked to the collapse. Rose is saying that the better long term solution is to unveil the sickness of institutionalized violence, rather than to perhaps mitigate it and keep it hidden with a marginal move toward libertarianism.